Home > What we believe


England already has some independent state schools – Academies. Like charter schools in America or free schools in Sweden, they are non-selective schools run by someone other than the Government. They receive public funding according to the number of pupils they attract, and they can be (and should be) closed down if they are not performing well.
The difference between England and these other countries is that there aren’t very many independent state schools, and the Government controls where and when they are set up. This means a pool of potential providers – teachers, charities, international organisations or even groups of parents – are shut out from the process. However good their plan and vision, whatever their experience, they cannot set up a new school. It also means that bureaucrats decide how many schools are needed, not parents.
That should change. There are still too many parents without an adequate choice – who cannot afford to move to the right postcode or pay school fees, and whose only option is to try and ‘play the system’ to go to a good state school.
This is unjust. It is not inevitable.
The New Schools Network wants any group with a vision and a coherent plan to set up a school. If parents choose to send their child to that school, it should receive public money.
We are not advocating a full-scale revolution. The majority of state schools are good – many are superb. Few parents would choose to leave those schools, and they will continue to thrive. Nor do we wish to remove accountability – all schools should be expected to get good results for their pupils, regardless of their structure. If a new school is not doing well by its pupils, it should not stay open.
However in those areas – overwhelmingly the most deprived – where pupils are not getting the chances of their richer peers, new schools will provide opportunities which do not exist. In areas where the local rural school is being closed down because the local authority believes it cannot afford to keep it open, parents should be given a chance to prove them wrong. And if parents feel that their local school’s approach does not suit their child, they could seek an alternative.
In England, the Academy movement has produced schools which have transformed standards in the poorest areas in the country. However the process is too centrally planned with too many restrictions and too little accountability. The Network believes:
27 Queen Anne’s Gate
London
SW1H 9BU
020 7222 8666
© New Schools Network
Charity number 1132122
Site: drewlondon.co.uk